|
Some Mini Reviews
Ghost Town A likeable enough film. It won't wow you or anything, but it's a fun redemption story. -- Rating B Mamma Mia! I know some people who loved this movie, but for me everyone on screen seemed to be trying way too hard to convince us they were having a good time. -- Rating C plus Traitor A pretty good film with strong performances -- Rating B Tropic Thunder Sometimes works, sometimes stalls -- Rating B minus You Don't Mess With the Zohan - Hmmm, let's see... Adam Sandler as a pumped-up Jewish gigalo. Rob Schneider as a Palestinian missing his goat. Gross-out humor. Slapstick. Middle East jokes. Yes, I would agree. Don't mess with the Zohan. -- Rating: C minus Appaloosa - A Textbook Western Appaloosa is a decent Western with two strong performances. Although it's not particularly gripping, it holds your interest, which is saying something these days. Beyond that, it's a leisurely paced, beautifully filmed movie. The story's pretty textbook, a slightly different take on everything from John Wayne to High Noon to Eastwood's spaghetti Westerns to Blazing Saddles. The bad guys (led by Jeromy Irons) have taken over the town, so the jittery citizens have to find a hired gun or two (Ed Harris and Viggo Mortenson) to clean things up. Except for Renee Zellweger's intriguing character (but rather ho-hum performance), there are no major surprises. No, this is more about acting than it is writing. And here two performances lead the way. Ed Harris (who also directs) turns in another dynamic performance in a career loaded with them. As an aging Marshall with anger management issues, he is thoroughly captivating. Even better, arguably, is Mortenson as Harris's quiet sidekick and best buddy. He couldn't be more interesting. Though good, Irons has little to work with. The film's major flaw, apart from predictability, is its failure to present bad-enough bad guys. Rating B minus Burn After Reading - What Did We Learn?
Burn After Reading is another crazy Coen brothers’ comedy in which oddball characters take precedence over story and the message, if any, is left wide open for interpretation and debate. The film is enjoyable enough, especially compared to most of the other schlock being offered this year. And yet, the film never moves much beyond amusing. Burn After Reading is filled with A-list stars like George Clooney, Brad Pitt, John Malkovich, and Frances McDormand, not to mention other notables like J.K. Simmons and Tilda Swinton. Each is fun in their own way. And yet they all seem to be in competition for who can create the best weirdo, in the Coen brothers’ sense. Many will cite Pitt’s zany turn as a fitness trainer, while others will point to Clooney as a womanizer or Malkovich’s take on anger management or McDormand's nervous obsessive compulsive tendencies. I liked Simmons the best, because his character, dares to ask: “What, if anything, did we learn?” And the answer goes something like this: “Not to do it again, whatever it is we did.” Rating B The Dark Knight - Holy Smokes, Batman!
Holy Smokes!! I don't know what I can add to the ongoing dialogue about the latest Batman flick beyond what has already been said. Much has been written. But I'll give it a shot. The Dark Knight isn't a masterpiece, but it is exceptional, heads above most movies made and near the very top of the ever growing catalogue of superhero films. It makes Ironman look like a clunker and Hancock look like an even bigger embarrassment than it is. So much discussion about Heath Ledger. Is it all hype over a tragic death? No. This is one of the best film performances I've ever seen. I'm serious. The Joker may be the only character who could make Javier Bardem's monster from No Country for Old Men turn and run away. Christian Bale was a bit puzzling however. I can't say that he was great. Yes, the film is dark. Exceptionally dark. Brooding, existential, creepy. Or, as some have said, haunted. And in going so dark, it becomes one of the better "thinking" films of the year. Rating: A minus Hancock - Two for the Price of One
Hancock is the most schizophrenic film I've ever seen. Seriously. The first half, involving bad-boy superhero Hancock's PR makeover and hopeful redemption, soars through the skies, like a bird, a plane, a... well, you get where this is going. I truly wondered what all the negative press was about. But wait a minute. Just when you're convinced you're seeing something special, the film tanks like no other film before it, sinking faster and deeper than the Titanic, and I don't mean the movie. It's as though two different directors filmed two different screenplays and then pasted them together, one good and one miserably awful. Indeed, the second half of Hancock is so bad that the first half becomes a dim memory, quick forgotten, leaving a bad taste in your mouth, like sushi that's sat out on the counter for a week. Two films, for the price of one really bad movie. Despite a spectacular beginning, the overall film still qualifies as one of the worst of the year, which is saying something. Charlize Theron should be ashamed, turning in one of the lousiest performances in recent memory, thanks in great part to anincredibly lousy role. But still, she stinks it up, big time. Will Smith fares somewhat better, but only somewhat. Perhaps the most amazing aspect of this film is Jason Bateman's memorable performance. Somehow, Bateman gives one of the best supporting performances of the year in the midst of all the muck. Who'd a thunk? But Hancock still sucks, even compared to other stinkers in what has proven to be a pretty bad summer at the movies. Rating C minus |
|
|
Dinner and a Movie?
Well, I finally made it over to one of the Warren Theatre’s two grand auditoriums for a “balcony experience.” That’s the place to go, they say, if you want to get the biggest bang for your movie buck. Or, in this case, for eighteen bucks a seat. For those of you who enjoy living a first class lifestyle, or at least dabbling in one every now and then, there’s really no cinematic comparison in Oklahoma, at least to my knowledge. We begin with reserved seats. That means you don’t have to arrive at the theater forty-five minutes early in order to see a blockbuster film (they only put the biggest grossing films in the two grand auditoriums). You can get there ten minutes early if you want, or even arrive late, and your seat is still waiting for you. Next, you have one of the best seats in the house, spacious, with plenty of elbow room and an incredible view of the huge screen. And because the seats are so spread out on what appears to be higher rows, there’s very little chance of having your view partially blocked if some six foot seven guy sits on the row in front of you. And then you have the seats themselves. They’re oversized--that is, much bigger than the theater’s “normal” seats, which are already large. Plus, they’re extremely comfy and as warm as you wish, for the seats have built-in seat warmers. Just ask and one of the attendants will bring you a footrest for even greater comfort. Meanwhile, you and your significant other may order from the theater’s impressive restaurant menu, with a fair amount of food and drink options, including, if you’re interested, adult beverages. The choices are reasonably priced, and the portions served are generous, if not large. Plus, in my humble opinion, the food is good. A balcony experience at the Moore Warren is certainly not cheap. A couple begins the night at $36 and goes from there, depending on how hungry and thirsty they are. But many (like me) will find the overall experience to be worth it, especially when you consider the pampering and reasonably priced food. There are many restaurants that would cost as much without the opportunity to see a good film (knock on wood) and all the extra creature comforts. My wife wants to go back at least once a month. That’s quite an endorsement. The Best Movie Theater in Oklahoma
The fabulous Warren Theater has now opened in Moore, America, on Interstate 35, right next to the Wal-Mart, the Lowes, the new Furr’s, and many rows of strip malls. It’s a curious decision, to place what has been touted as the nicest movie theater in America smack dab in the middle of what has always been considered a blue collar town. Yeah, I know what they say — that Moore has one of the highest grossing zip codes in the state within close proximity to the theater. But reputations are difficult to change, and it would be hard to make the case that Moore is an entertainment destination, rather than a drive-through. Still, I don’t want to be a cynic. I want to believe that the good citizens of Moore will buck the nationwide trend and flock in droves to the theater. I want to believe that the Warren will attract some from Oklahoma City (north, not south) who want to avoid Bricktown’s parking issues. I even want to believe that folks from Norman will drive to Moore, forgetting city rivalries for the sake of going to a really nice theater. But I’m also hoping that poetry will make a big comeback, so there you go. Anyway, I attended the grand opening ceremonies with all these hopes in mind, and let me just say I was quite impressed. Oh, I’ve been to the Warren Theaters in Wichita, so I knew what to expect. But still, it’s rather shocking to step into the Warren after watching movies at the Spotlight 14 for years. It’s kind of like the moment when Dorothy steps into Oz, and the film turns from black and white to color. The Warren is already the best theater in Oklahoma, hands down. The only theater that’s even in the ballpark, in my opinion, is the Poncan in Ponca City. I mean the Warren has it all. Ginormous screens, oh-so comfy seats, curtains that rise as the film is about to begin, digital projectors, balcony restaurants that serve adult beverages, and real butter on the popcorn! The friendly staff has been trained to make you feel you are living the life of luxury and to forget about those tornado sirens blaring in the distance. Opening night was a spectacular event, even though I opted to watch George Clooney’s Leatherheads, a so-so film, C plus on my scale, and despite the fact that one speaker seemed to be speaking a different language. But since then I’ve been several times. I saw Ironman there, supposedly the “best-reviewed” film of the year. But I was underwhelmed. Ironman is good enough I suppose, for a summer film. But it’s no better than a B with all that back story and testosterone. Still better films will come, surely, and that speaker is probably resting comfortably in some junkyard by now. Want to have fun at the movies again? Well, consult your favorite critic, pick a good film, and then head over to the Warren. That should do the trick. |
|
|
My 100 Favorite Films of All Time |
The Ten Best Films of 2007 |
|
More of Jim's reviews may be found at http://www.rottentomatoes.com/author-3222 .
|
|

